Me: "Hey God, you know everything, right?"
God: "Of course, my child"
Me: "So if I said something, you would be able to tell me if it was truthful or not?"
God: "That is correct"
Me: "So if I said, 2 + 2 = 4..."
God: "..I would know that such a statement was true"
Me: "and if I said 6 * 9 = 42..."
God: "..I would know that to be false"
Me: "and you will always be able to answer correctly?"
God: "Well I am God you know..."
Me: "oooh I've got one..."
God: "Go on..."
Me: "This statement is false"
God: "That is...ummm...well...." *God's head explodes*
Me: "Shit! I just killed god!"
Linguistic arguments are just that. You must be very careful when you try to deduce conclusions from them.
If God did exist, his ability to "know the future" would not remove his ability to have free will.
On the other hand, God's ability to know the future would remove our ability to exercise free will.
The difference being, God would not exist within "time", but of course, we do.
Can God create a rock so heavy he cannot lift it?
Can God draw a square circle?
Can God come up with a proof that 2+2=5?
All meaningless arguments, which do nothing to disprove the notion of an omnipotent/omniscient God.
__________________
|