Quote:
Originally posted by HarmlessRabbit
Step 1: enact a tax cut in June 2002 (not to mention the other tax cut, but for the sake of argument let's look at the June 2002 cut, which has had plenty of time to take an effect)
Step 2: lose jobs
What part of the statistic above about job loss is unclear?
|
Step 1: Collect Underpants
Step 2:
Step 3: PROFIT!
Harmless you are missing a step 1.5, with your logic we can assume the following.
Step 1: Chicago White Sox have a June 2002 record 12 16.
Step 2: Lose Jobs.
Or
Step 1: enact a tax cut in June 2002 (not to mention the other tax cut, but for the sake of argument let's look at the June 2002 cut, which has had plenty of time to take an effect)
Step 2: Chicago White Sox have a June 2002 record 12 16.
So using your logic I have proven that the Chicago White Sox win/loss record causes job loss and that tax cuts have caused the team to have a losing record.
Now again, how did me getting back 600 of the dollars that my labor earned cost someone their job when I spent the money on the nice desk I'm using right now? (Its a really nice one too, its like two desks joined together, my wife uses one half and I use the other, it also cost exactly 600 dollars (plus tax))