Quote:
Originally posted by Ustwo
That’s where I think its wrong, they are not identical, having a mother and father is a good thing, and its better for the child development to have a male and female role model.
An interesting side note is how STABLE are homosexual marriages/unions. A quick google search seems to point to 'not very' as a rule. Should this be considered as well?
|
How about deciding whether a particular couple can adopt a child based on their individual merits rather than the merits of a subset of people to which they happen to belong? If that was too hard for you to parrse, here's a concrete example. Would you automatically refuse a black couple adoption because most black people have a low income? No, you would look at
their income and decide, right? How about doing the same with homosexual couples?
Sadly, this is beside the point. It seems obvious to me that you have already decided you don't want homosexual people to raise children and are looking for reasons to back up a conclusion you've already made. This is called "rationalization" and it occurs far too much in society.
Oh yeah, one other thing. You once mentioned how not allowing homosexual parents was politically incorrect. I think we can all agree that the
vast majority of the US is
against homosexual rights of any kind, considering what a Bible thumping nation it is. How can an idea that the nation agrees on be considered politically incorrect?