View Single Post
Old 10-17-2003, 06:18 AM   #26 (permalink)
lurkette
My future is coming on
 
lurkette's Avatar
 
Moderator Emeritus
Location: east of the sun and west of the moon
Quote:
Originally posted by chavos
lurk...

I'll take your word on it...i've never studied sociology. But i don't believe that's completely getting to teh core of the question. If family and government are doing the same thing according to this theory...i question how accurate it is on teh details to give it such breadth of scope.
They're not necessarily doing the same exact things - but think about it. In order to live with other people, we need to learn how to behave, right? Family lays the framework for that - teach kids to say please and thank you, to share, not to pick your nose in public, etc. Teach them the basic rules of the game. Education teaches them practical skills and knowledge but also how to get along with other people, frameworks of competition and cooperation, etc. Now what happens when you're free of those family and education system constraints? To some extent, people internalize the rules they've learned. But you've still got a good 60 years to go, and what keeps people in line? Government passes and enforces laws that keep us from killing and stealing from each other. If you start your own family, you're re-inserted into that structure and its constraints. Religion is another way of keeping people in line, so to speak: one, it sets down the rules for how to treat other people, but it also provides a deeply internalized constraint on how to behave - your eternal soul is on the line. It's not just about your relationship to other people (although you are in a community whose purpose is to support you in following certain precepts), it's about a relationship to a higher power. What better authority to keep people in line than a deity who can see your actions all the time, and can see into your very soul and knows not just what you do but what you feel and think? I'm not trying to be cynical, I'm just saying that religion does in fact serve a purpose of social control.

Quote:
If all community, and all human relation is social control and cohesion...then organized science is about social control and cohesion. That, i don't buy.
Why don't you buy it? Think about the peer review process, the system of conferences and other methods for sharing scientific work. It at least works as a measure of social control for scientists. In terms of social control for the larger society, sometimes science is relevant and sometimes it's not.
__________________
"If ten million people believe a foolish thing, it is still a foolish thing."

- Anatole France
lurkette is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360