Quote:
In an effort not to step on the belief's of any single person, should we not do away with all form's of public interaction. If you can't talk, see, read, hear or feel, then we won't offend anyone. Having said that, I have always believed that majority rules, so if over 50% of the people want reference's to God on the money, in the pledge, or before the football game, it should stay.
|
If majority rules, why even have a constitution? What if the majority decided that no one should be allowed to own a handgun? In some states that's how the majority feels. Should we then just throw out the second amendment because the fickle majority says so?
Why is this such a stretch? How is "in god we trust" even remotely constitutional? Why is it such a big deal to remove it?