View Single Post
Old 10-12-2003, 03:57 AM   #27 (permalink)
CSflim
Sky Piercer
 
CSflim's Avatar
 
Location: Ireland
Quote:
Originally posted by Lunchbox7
Light has a certain ability for force (laser for example). A laser can manipulate its surrounding through a degree of force. Froce is speed x mass. If something can produce force (even as little as light) then it has to have a component of mass. I have no idea what relativistic speed is so I cant say anything there.


"Froce is speed x mass" - Oh dear god!

Newton's law do not hold for things with very large mass, or for things at very high speed. Light travels at very high speed. As such, you cannot use Newton's laws to try to explain it (even if you manage to state said laws correctly).
Light is massless, but it still has a momenteum, or impart a force. If light had a mass, it would not be able to travel at light speed!
This can only be understood by modern physics. This is why newtonian physics is reffered to as "classical" physics.

Quote:
I am currently involved in research on colour vision in the periphery. On my reading I have discovered that "visual receptors can absorb and respond to as little as a single photon of light" (Kalat, 2001, p152).

Isnt what I said all along is that heat is the byproduct of the tranformation of onf one from of energy to another form of energy? It appears that you just argued my original case for me. Thanks.

Isnt somthing hot if it produces heat? whether it comes from energy transformation or not. If you run your hand on a spinning wheel Im willing to bet your hand will get hot. Thus your hand gets hot from the wheel so you could accurately describe the spinning wheel as hot.

And you are now changing the definition of heat.
Running your hand along a moving wheel will cause friction, which will generate heat. But by no means what-so-ever could you describe the spinning wheel to be hot.
Tape a thermometer to the spinning wheel, and you will find out how hot it is. It will be at room temperature. Rub your hand against it, and some of the kinetic energy will be converted by friction into heat energy, and the temperature will rise. The wheel is now hot, but it wasn't before you converted its kinetic energy into heat.
Without your intervention by no means could you claim the wheel was hot.

Now it appears, that you are not only wrong, but you are being arrogant about it.
__________________
CSflim is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360