"SunnComm believes that by making erroneous assumptions in putting together his critical review of the MediaMax CD-3 technology, Halderman came to false conclusions concerning the robustness and efficacy of SunnComm's MediaMax technology," it said.
This part sounds like the shift key thing isn't true. If not and Sunncomm lost value over an untrue statement about the efficacy of their product, would the kid be liable? Still, I wonder how they think they are going to recoup a $10 million dollar market value loss through lawsuit. It's not like the guy could pay that much in damages even if they did win.
Does anyone know if his report is correct?
__________________
Cogito ergo spud -- I think, therefore I yam
|