|
As much as I dislike Bush and his cadre of psychos (or morons...depends what you think) that surround him, I think Michael Moore is the epitomy of cretinous, arrogant, manipulative left-wing grandstanding. His work is designed to sell to those who drench themselves in their left wingedness and take on a kind of drooling idiocy with regard to it.
If his questions have any merit, its simply good luck on his part rather than a measure of his intellect.
That being said, I do want to question why these are questions he asked? There are more important questions - such as with how the current administration has co-opted the tradgedy to achieve unrelated policy objectives - than the ones he asks which are designed as personal attacks on Bush. Such tactics, and the obvious tone he uses, makes his arguements look even less legitimate than they already are.
|