#3. He makes many good points about the Saudi involvement. You need to take the blinders off and realize just how much anti-US sentiment there is in SA, and how much they cooperate with Bin Ladin out of fear of him turning the populace against them.
The answers, they are in the 9/11 report that Bush decided to censor from us. Those who wrote it have told us more or less that there is incriminating information against the Saudis in those censored pages. Read the 9/11 report, all 800+ pages of it. It's interesting.
#4. FEL, you're wrong
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/09/04/po...3f9a90&ei=5070
Quote:
WASHINGTON, Sept. 3 — Top White House officials personally approved the evacuation of dozens of influential Saudis, including relatives of Osama bin Laden, from the United States in the days after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks when most flights were still grounded, a former White House adviser said today.
The adviser, Richard Clarke, who ran the White House crisis team after the attacks but has since left the Bush administration, said he agreed to the extraordinary plan because the Federal Bureau of Investigation assured him that the departing Saudis were not linked to terrorism. The White House feared that the Saudis could face "retribution" for the hijackings if they remained in the United States, Mr. Clarke said.
|
Moore was right about that one. He was screaming about it while most of american media had discounted it. It has since been reported as true by most outlets.
Finally, we have a history of making alliances with brutal dictators, and history has taught us nothing.
We are now in a similar situation in Uzbekistan. Bush learns nothing.
http://www.tfproject.org/tfp/showthr...threadid=25785