As far as the original entry in this thread goes, the guy would have been prosecuted for pandering. Taking the pics wasn't illegal - she knew he had done so, and by posing for 'em had given her consent. Giving the pics to his buds also wasn't illegal - once she gave her consent for him to possess them, he can do whatever he wants with them.
However, when he put an advertisement on them with her phone number (in essence, using the photos as a tool to possibly drum up business for this girl), that was pandering (in other words, he was pimpin' her out).
That's why he would have been busted, and why the fine was so lenient.
|