|
Re: The 9th is at it again...
Quote:
A three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that requiring blood samples for the database amounts to an illegal invasion of privacy because they are taken without legal suspicion.
The court said that is a violation of inmates' Fourth-Amendment rights against illegal searches.
Blood samples taken from federal prisoners have been used to convict hundreds of people. [/B]
|
That basically sums it up right there. Another 3 judge panel from the most Liberal group of people EVER. I assume this will get over turned like 3/4's of their decisions. I suppose this is what happens when you get judges more interested in making policy rather then interpreting the constitution.
__________________
To win a war you must serve no master but your ambition.
|