|
I actually think there's more of a ground to sue the guy Hanxter mentioned than the guy in the thread starter's post I think.
The one Hanxter mentioned didn't have consent to take those pictures. The guy from the original post did.
Frankly, I think it's an incredibly sleazy thing to do, but he had consent to take those pictures and, legally, he owns them and can do whatever he wants with them. I think the girl's lucky is he gets ANYTHING. A civil suit, perhaps, but there's nothing actually legally wrong with what he did in my opinion.
__________________
Le temps détruit tout
"Musicians are the carriers and communicators of spirit in the most immediate sense." - Kurt Elling
|