View Single Post
Old 09-28-2003, 12:08 PM   #17 (permalink)
stingc
Psycho
 
Location: PA
Re: Is a black hole low or high entropy?

Quote:
I am aware of Hawking radiation. Which means that a black hole can actually spew out matter. Would it be possible for it to spew out enough to destabilise it, and "de-collapse" it?
A black hole emits Hawking radiation, which is energy, and therefore mass. The mass is taken away from the black hole, so it gets smaller over time. The rate at which it gets smaller increases the smaller it gets, so its kind of like a runaway reaction. Nobody knows if the black hole ever disappears entirely. It eventually gets small enough that quantum gravity is required to describe what's going on.

Quote:
As far as I know hawking radiation works as such: (correct me if I'm wrong)
Near the "threshold of no return" of a black hole a matter/antimatter particle pair comes into existence. Normally these particles would instantly annihilate each other, but in this circumstance, one of the particles is caught by the gravity of the black hole, but the other manages to escape. Which of the particles escapes? The particle or anti particle? And why? Surely both are under the influence of the massive gravity?
This has been the popular line of how Hawking radiation works for over 20 years, but the usual calculations have nothing to do with particle/antiparticle pairs. There's no good intuitive picture for them actually.

Then a couple of years ago someone decided to see if this cartoon picture actually made any sense in reality. Amazingly, it all worked out. This is a valid way of looking at it. (just thought I'd clarify the history)

Anyways, both the particle and antiparticle have an equal probability to escape.

As for your other questions, the answers are mostly that nobody knows. First of all, things are really messed up and nonintuitive in standard classical relativity. Almost every notion from classical physics is thrown out the window. Its therefore very difficult to define what entropy and the 2nd law even mean except in the most idealized situations.

Add to that that entropy is best defined (not the only way though) by comparing microstates and macrostates. Nobody has much of an idea what microstates are in curved spacetime because there's no quantum gravity theory.

Also, singularities are problems with the classical theory. Understanding them will require a quantum description.
stingc is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360