jbrooks544

Anyone who takes this post seriously needs to get real. There isn't a definition of what feminism is or why it supposedly is bad - same for PC. Nevermind that there are no facts given or proof or argument of any kind that the opening assertions are true.

For example:
..."Many males in western societies seem to be behaving very badly these days."...
- Umm, exactly how many men and what exactly have they been doing badly and to what extent is it more or less than in the past?

..."They seem to be becoming more involved with crime. They seem to be growing more dishonest. They seem to be increasingly hostile and aggressive toward others. They seem less committed to their partners and to their families. They are clearly doing less well in terms of their education. And they seem to be more pre-occupied with their own narrow self-interests than they used to be."...

- Every single line is unsupported. Crime rates are at an all time low, duh
- How are men becoming more dishonest? by what measure exactly? One can't be given because is isn't true and isn't provable. I can't even go on, because every line is not supported, contains no rational arguments (learn what a "rational argument" is - there aren't any in that post, believe me. All of the intro "truisms" are just a foil for going into some word salad anti woman , anti black, anti semetic diatribe.
- Feminism isn't "bad". Some tenents of radical feminism are stupid and not supported by most people and feminists. P.C. is pretty "bad" but that is a separate argument and not directly related to feminism or Jews or responsible for some supposed new outbreak of "men behaving badly".

This post makes Rush Libaugh's logic look like a graduate course in, well, logic.