Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community - View Single Post

Sun Tzu · 09-22-2003, 08:38 PM

What does IMO mean to you Dragonlich? Id would be great to speak to anyone that has had first hand experience or has been there with anything anyone talks about here. Do we need to really have this conversation because take the same standard and apply to it everyone including yourself. The small problem is the common agreement that conservatives own this and liberals that, arabs this; zionists that. Theres been a few threads about media bullshit; yet its all we have unless ofcourse you've been there to see any event. I do agree with one sign the site had; CNN lies. Do I want to go into a lengthy list of showing what your asking for, no because I know your intelligent enough to choose what information your going top believe and what your not. The site gives a detailed history of Arafat. My point isnt disputing whether the info it has is false (although some may be after reading other areas) but does it provide a foundation of credability by providing the truth on the other side or put Sharon on a pedestal as a saint. I was asking only for a copy and paste of the info on Sharon to be posted from the same source the info on Arafat was provided.

I’m going to point out a source any time I see it being totally biased in any direction Zionist, PLO, BLOW, SLOPPY JOE

That argument has been brought up before "prove it". . . can anyone prove anything here? I’m confident I can prove this to be a biased site, I don’t really need to because like I frequently say IMO---which seems to be the thing I need to do every third word when you’re reading my posts. Yeah I was a troll for posting dumb pictures of fake WMD, and I apologized for it.

Your same argument or point can be used in any direction, I wont doubt you'll probably call me on that providing some footage with Arafat lighting a fuse or caught in the act, maybe even CIA documents that have become declassified.

Notice I’m careful to always put phrases such as IMO, as I interpret, and so on specifically for people such as yourself that might take the things I say as a self proclaimed google expert in anything you want to know. I'd really like that be assumed; because in support of what you've stated very few of us have been in any scenario personally on the subjects we feel were educating everyone in. Please understand some of the things I state about this issue (Israel) I didn’t get from the net, or a book I’ve been there many times to just about every part of it, so I feel I have some good experience to draw my own interpretation of what’s going on.

Whenever I post a source I attempt to go as deep as possible (who funded it; their sources of info) to make sure it as neutral as possible; should everyone else do it? Each to their own I’m not telling anyone what they should do, but if it’s a subject I have some knowledge of and I see the potential distortions (or what I see as) I going to state it.

Whether or not it’s the words you’re putting in my mouth "propaganda" will also be each to their own as well. The point I was making is what Labell justifiably pointed out and called me on; this site X 1000.

There’s been other occasions where I wanted to reply with a similar statement, but didn’t so I will now. Everything is my opinion or interpretation. To let you know ahead I may fall short of putting IMO at the end of each sentence, but that’s the way it is; I hope and trust you'll take it as such because I don’t choose to explain this in this format again because while I have disagreements with people your the only one that has consistently brought up this perspective. If you do the only thing I ask is you provide the same material you wish to see from me. Count on me checking the sources (funding, the reporter themselves, and anything else I have the ability to. Frankly I think there’s allot of "terrorists" in high places all over that have done bad shit and are responsible for allot of innocent life lost but will never have to answer for their crimes. There’s a few more Kill threads Id like to start in addition to Arafat the terrible.

Lastly to indirectly answer your question I read every source someone posts fully with an open mind initially, the proof you’re asking for has the problem of everything I mentioned and the very argument you brought up. I respect you for stating what you see and stating your stance, but please count on me dismissing something I see biased.

/your welcome.

09-22-2003, 08:38 PM	#46 (permalink)
Sun Tzu Conspiracy Realist Location: The Event Horizon	What does IMO mean to you Dragonlich? Id would be great to speak to anyone that has had first hand experience or has been there with anything anyone talks about here. Do we need to really have this conversation because take the same standard and apply to it everyone including yourself. The small problem is the common agreement that conservatives own this and liberals that, arabs this; zionists that. Theres been a few threads about media bullshit; yet its all we have unless ofcourse you've been there to see any event. I do agree with one sign the site had; CNN lies. Do I want to go into a lengthy list of showing what your asking for, no because I know your intelligent enough to choose what information your going top believe and what your not. The site gives a detailed history of Arafat. My point isnt disputing whether the info it has is false (although some may be after reading other areas) but does it provide a foundation of credability by providing the truth on the other side or put Sharon on a pedestal as a saint. I was asking only for a copy and paste of the info on Sharon to be posted from the same source the info on Arafat was provided. I’m going to point out a source any time I see it being totally biased in any direction Zionist, PLO, BLOW, SLOPPY JOE That argument has been brought up before "prove it". . . can anyone prove anything here? I’m confident I can prove this to be a biased site, I don’t really need to because like I frequently say IMO---which seems to be the thing I need to do every third word when you’re reading my posts. Yeah I was a troll for posting dumb pictures of fake WMD, and I apologized for it. Your same argument or point can be used in any direction, I wont doubt you'll probably call me on that providing some footage with Arafat lighting a fuse or caught in the act, maybe even CIA documents that have become declassified. Notice I’m careful to always put phrases such as IMO, as I interpret, and so on specifically for people such as yourself that might take the things I say as a self proclaimed google expert in anything you want to know. I'd really like that be assumed; because in support of what you've stated very few of us have been in any scenario personally on the subjects we feel were educating everyone in. Please understand some of the things I state about this issue (Israel) I didn’t get from the net, or a book I’ve been there many times to just about every part of it, so I feel I have some good experience to draw my own interpretation of what’s going on. Whenever I post a source I attempt to go as deep as possible (who funded it; their sources of info) to make sure it as neutral as possible; should everyone else do it? Each to their own I’m not telling anyone what they should do, but if it’s a subject I have some knowledge of and I see the potential distortions (or what I see as) I going to state it. Whether or not it’s the words you’re putting in my mouth "propaganda" will also be each to their own as well. The point I was making is what Labell justifiably pointed out and called me on; this site X 1000. There’s been other occasions where I wanted to reply with a similar statement, but didn’t so I will now. Everything is my opinion or interpretation. To let you know ahead I may fall short of putting IMO at the end of each sentence, but that’s the way it is; I hope and trust you'll take it as such because I don’t choose to explain this in this format again because while I have disagreements with people your the only one that has consistently brought up this perspective. If you do the only thing I ask is you provide the same material you wish to see from me. Count on me checking the sources (funding, the reporter themselves, and anything else I have the ability to. Frankly I think there’s allot of "terrorists" in high places all over that have done bad shit and are responsible for allot of innocent life lost but will never have to answer for their crimes. There’s a few more Kill threads Id like to start in addition to Arafat the terrible. Lastly to indirectly answer your question I read every source someone posts fully with an open mind initially, the proof you’re asking for has the problem of everything I mentioned and the very argument you brought up. I respect you for stating what you see and stating your stance, but please count on me dismissing something I see biased. /your welcome. __________________ *To confine our attention to terrestrial matters would be to limit the human spirit.- Stephen Hawking* Last edited by Sun Tzu; 09-23-2003 at 12:51 AM..