Depends on how frivolously the 'stuff' will be used, if it is something for an artificial heart or cancer treatment, the animals aren't quite as...I suppose "sentient", as we are yet so they are preferable to a human when testing things, but for lip stick, nail polish remover.
As for convicts, I think sociopathic murders and absolutely vile people (not your run of the mill violent inmate, the truly detestable nonfunctional human) should be subject to testing when it makes sense, instead of paying a random guy with money issues $500 to take the mystery fluid, get a convict, things of that sort, not removing his eye lids and tear ducts followed by complete immobilization for testing of eye damaging substances.
Quote:
|
Testing on animals is just another way that the humanity expresses its disdain for the Earth and life in general.
|
We don't have a disdain for the Earth and life in general. We seem to be subjugating nature. All those who are not profecient at doing such is primitive or savage, we defy the natural order of things since we are better, we except from the choas that is mother nature, we are more deserving of life, if we need land, we shall cut down the mighty woods and grow food so that our species may proliferate! *insert maniacle laugh* I know it isn't a very good, but our actions aren't manifestations of some kind of hate, more or less the result of thinking ourselves better.