Quote:
Originally posted by Tasu
So the m4 is a fragmentation weapon??
Debaser, i've been through this whole topic and all you do is try to prove every single person wrong and that you're right. Guess what, there is no right answer, because these people are telling their opinion. So that means you stfu.
Ak-47 is way better (even looks more sinsiter). we shoulda kept the m14 in nam. the OICW is going to be really cool.
I also know for a fact you can take the cover off an AK47 and pour sand into it with it still being functional. You can do that with glocks uzis and a whole shitload of other weapons.
And with a uzi, you can take the cover off, pour sand into it untill it overflows, level the sand off with a popsicle stick, replace the cover, and fire. just like magic
|
Tasu,
As this is your first post in the topic, I don't know why you are getting on Debaser's case, but please try to keep the tone down. In otherwords, moderate yourself or be moderated.
He is free to argue his position as you are free to dispute it.
Yes, the M4 is a 'fragmentation' weapon in that the 5.56 round fragments when it tumbles in flesh if it still has sufficient spin.
Debaser was just saying that the round from the M4 will still fragment sufficiently out to 200 yards.
As to the rest, you're kidding, right?