Quote:
Originally posted by j8ear
You have absolutely ZERO rights or protections of the sort. ZERO.
Libel and slander both REQUIRE malice. Because it is said or written and you are offended by it does not require malice. This is a different discussion.
As far as quoting me inaccurately and declaring a view I do not possess, I clearly made exception for certain speech which is not protected. It has nothing, what-so-ever to do with the offense taken by an observer.
bear
btw...This isn't really my balli-wick. I'll keep out hence forth, and let you 'heavy-weights' intellectually duke it out.
|
You don't think hate speech is motivated by malice?
Please answer the questions regarding harm versus protection in the parallel legal construction I presented.
My confusion in your response stems from the fact that you claim to be restricted in some of what you can say yet also claim that I have ZERO protection from your statements.
Which is it? The two statements are mutually exclusive--I either have some protection or you believe in an absolute right to say whatever you want.