Thread: Patriot Act
View Single Post
Old 09-16-2003, 06:29 PM   #21 (permalink)
MuadDib
Psycho
 
MuadDib's Avatar
 
As far as the first Patriot Act I am mostly referring to 213, 215, & 216 because I don't find most defenses of them adequate (I think those numbers are right, I didn't take the time to relook them up). Also our friend at Gitmo Bay are all suspected terrorists who are almost universally denied legal council and who's trials take place before military tribunal because they are considered POWs. The problem with this is that some of these "POWs" are US citizens and have a constitutional right to a fair and expediate trial as well as a right to not be cruelly or unusually punished. Now one can not really say what is happening to the prisoners there so it isn't necessarily that they are being mistreated but they very well could be. Furthermore, we have had inspectors (either UN or Amnesty, I can't remember) report that the POWs are being mistreated. This is even suspect according to rules of war. Finally, the majority of the prisoners though not US citizen ought to have the same rights in American court as we do. The thing is we consider these rights as fair and just treatment for all mankind and the way we treat those who we think oppose us really speaks volumes about our country. In reference to citizens being deported that would be made available under the Expanded Patriot Act that is currently being proposed. No one has fallen victim yet but it just gives the executive too much power and it clearly was against our founders intent to give the executive such power directly over the citizenry (ironically the presidents constituency)

Seretogis: That right why don't we just make all crimes capital crimes because there aren't degrees of statute violations? Drug makers and creators are not terrorists in the sense of the Patriot Acts intent nor in the minds of most members of congress. Though you could broadly interpret terrorism to incorporate drug makers and dealers, at that point you could really interpret it to anything.
__________________
"The courts that first rode the warhorse of virtual representation into battle on the res judicata front invested their steed with near-magical properties." ~27 F.3d 751
MuadDib is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360