|
I've heard many Catholics have religion based fetishes due to the oppressive nature of the religion. The director was probably filling a demand like any business would. Porn is running out of ways to be dirty and this was bound to happen eventually. I think the innocents are hurt by the archaic and superstitious laws of the church more than the acts of the director.
Think on this:
I would be willing to bet at least one of my testes that sexual acts have been performed in many churches at least once that have never been discovered. Now following the logic of the Catholic church that would mean even without proof of "defilement" all churches possibly are unfit to perform religious services given the law of averages that it has happened at some time in many churches. So where does this leave everyone who had a wedding in a defiled but undiscovered church? See what I'm getting at? It's like eating a sandwich with a bug in it...if you are unaware of the bug at all you won't get sick. The minute you see it is when it grosses you out. I think it's the promise of the people in the wedding that matters...they swear to their god to love honor etc; It doesn't really matter where they do it considering many weddings take place on unconsecrated ground such as a park or what have you. It's all crap to me. Bet you there's some kinda fee to get "remarried", haha.
__________________
I happen to like the words "fuck", "cock", "pussy", "tits", "cunt", "twat", "shit" and even "bitch". As long as I am not using them to describe you, don't go telling me whether or not I can/should use them...that is, if you want me to continue refraining from using them to describe you. ~Prince
|