|
This is pointless. You cannot, absolutely cannot, assume to know a person's reasoning for taking an action. Just because an act could have been selfish does not mean that it was. Sure you can examine a given situation and come up with many selfish reasons that a person took those actions, but that does not mean that those were in fact the motivations for their actions.
You say that if you take away the reward for the action then the action would not be perfomed, but you also say that everything is predetermined and therefore there is no free will. If this is true then wouldn't the action be performed whether or not the reward was still present?
Your logic is very flawed. Until you can prove without a shadow of a doubt that all actions are indeed motivated by selfish desires you have proven nothing.
|