I'm stunned that a thinker like yourself (CSflim) would notice the instantaneous nature of being and follow it up with by considering immortality. Pardon me if the beer has taken over my logic, but it seems you missed the point that we do not in fact exist. For beings like ourselves immortality is a relative concept. We are immortal in the broad sense of action/reaction, and yet we do not inherently exist. Which transient moment would you say defines "you" ? No two are the same, mind you..
|