|
it wasn't twain. it was benjamin disraeli. But that's not the point. my overblown reaction to your figure of speech was to show just how meaningless and sneaky the use of such figures are. If you don't have data to back it, you have a completely unrepresentative sample size that means nothing. Using that statistic despite that is deceptive, pure and simple. And you dog religion for not caring about the Truth? Please...
|