View Single Post
Old 09-05-2003, 01:34 AM   #11 (permalink)
Nitro
Upright
 
Location: on the North Sea shore
Quote:
BentNotTwisted:
"At high production rates that could mean a great deal of hydrogen being produced."
For every 16g of CH4 you put in you could get 44,8 litres of hydrogen (if you really crack it all). Electrolysis is easier!

Quote:
shakran:
"That means we have to separate the other molecule from the hydrogen, a process which takes a HELL of a lot of energy whether we do it with steam, electricity, or heat."
For 1m^3 of hydrogen it takes 4,5 kWh of electricity to produce it in a traditional way (steam, electricity, heat).
If you burn 1m^3 of hydrogen you get out ca. 3,3 kWh which leaves you with a "loss" of 1,2 kWh. If you compare this with electricity costs this would be something like 20 US cents lost.
Quote:
shakran:
"The simple fact is that hydrogen is an energy storage medium."
Totally true. It's not a primary energy source like natural gas it has to be produced prefferably with solar energy.
Quote:
shakran:
"As for the pressurized-inert-hydrogen. ..well, as you said this is VERY far off. "
No it's not. I did it in 2nd semester chemistry a few years ago. We did it with a kind of flintstone and pumped a few litres into a piece of the size of a toothpick. You have to warm it to get it out again.
The answer are metal-hydrides like FeTiH. You can put 30g hydrogen into a litre of this stuff which equals 336 litres of hydrogen under normal conditions.

Quote:
shakran:
"the safest method of delivery would be the solar powered on-site electrolysis. BIG problem with this,"
it's just a matter of size.

As for the transportation issue:
How about pipelines.
Brilliantly easy technology which is well researched and secure.
AirLiquide delivers hydrogen in pipelines in the US if you need it in large quantities.
Their german daughter has a whole network with hydrogen pipelines spanning 240km in the Rhine-Ruhr area (densly populated).
Running for many, many years - still no accidents.
Handling hydrogen is as dangerous as handling natural gas so the experience and technology to transport it is there.

Quote:
shakran:
"Fuel cell vehicles are a load of crap."
Not really. Fuel cells are more efficient at energy usage, just wait and see. At the moment it's only a question of space, power and heat to get them into a car.
In Europe they are already starting to put fuel cells into private homes to heat them and to provide them with power (no space problems in houses).
Nitro is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360