Can Arnold be a good govenor?
I think not. I don't think he's got much sense. All he's done is take an amazing physique and turn it into a hollywood career. People point at the longevity of his career as proof that he's done something. Sure he's a sucessful actor. Why should he be govenor?
Ronald Reagan was an actor turned California govenor turned president. That alone stands as a strong argument against Arnold.
Most of all I am digusted by his inability to enter the debate today. His camp would only enter a debate if they had the questions well in advance. What a mental wuss! If he's not smart enough to think on his feet, how will he get the job done day to day? I thought it was incorregible for him eat all the media attention today rather than letting it focus on the debate.
Am I wrong? Am I right? Lemme hear it.
|