|
I agree that based on what's in the article, this is stupid.
The question is "What isn't in this article??" There seem to be gaping holes here. No where is there a real statement about the hospital not allowing a second opinion from anyone except the parent's supporters or their lawyer. There's a lot of details about the diagnosis that the hospital and the state cannot reveal by law, so we probably won't know the basis for the state's position. Also, since when do we accept a lawyer's statement about the severity of a disease? Where is some independent, unbiased medical statement about the course of this cancer??
This just smells of a whole bunch of info missing. For now, I'll withhold my final judgement.
__________________
If love is blind, why is lingerie so popular?
|