|
So you all say that it's great that they beat the shit out of him for hitting two kids, who only suffered minor cuts and scrapes, because he stopped to check if they were OK. They had no idea that he had no license or insurance, for all they know, his brakes failed and he couldn't swerve out of the way in time. Maybe the open fire hydrant drenched the road, his car hydroplaned, and he couldn't stop it in time.
What makes these people so great for beating a guy after seeing only one side of the situation? Why the hell didn't they check on the kids before they went after him?
If you ask me, this isn't vigilantism, this is unjustified violence and extraordinarily irresponsible behavior.
|