|
RoadRage: Thanks for the article. I'm not gonna get into the Anti-Microsoft thing either, but the author makes a good point. When does Microsoft accept responsibility for flaws in its operating system. Patching this and patching that is a sign that there IS a major problem. I think the author is arguing that before releasing an OS with major flaws, Microsoft should be more careful to check and recheck.
I like this part of the article the best:
"...You can't just sue the software vendor for problems with their product like you can the maker of a vehicle or appliance since you've given up those rights by using the product under the terms of its license agreement. The only option you have is continue using the software in question and scrambling to update your systems whenever a new problem presents a danger to your information assets. In other words, when Microsoft says "patch" you salute and say "how soon?"
"Or, you can vote with your pocketbook and move to an alternative software product that works better, costs less to buy and maintain, and won't burn out your network support staff. Nobody's saying you must use any one particular product or operating system, and they all tend to perform the same basic functions needed in today's working society - although some are better at it than others. It may take a little bit of effort to switch and get used to the new product, but the long-term payoff will be worth it."
"After all, in the real world, if you don't like Ford trucks, you can buy a Jeep instead."
...Hmmmm....Something to think about.
|