Quote:
Originally posted by j8ear
This is completely absurd. There is no gaurantee constitutionally on inclusion. NONE WHAT SO EVER.
The people it doesn't represent? Are you so obsessed with diversity and inclusiveness that you discount our own human history on the alter of political correctness? Incorrect, inappropriate, socially detrimental, unconstitutional political correctness?
|
So...who gives a damn about all the new people in the country or its changing makeup, let's stick with what we were made from, rather than adapt?
Quote:
Originally posted by j8ear
Oh and just to clarify...I wouldn't give a hoot what was posted on the walls or illuminated under spot lights. Not one single inkling of caring in the least.
|
Good thing you don't make the laws, then, because the laws aren't what's best for j8ear. They're supposed to be what's best for everyone.
Quote:
Originally posted by j8ear
I see very little AKA cohesion in your assertions.
|
j8ear, remember that talk we had about slipping into incoherency?
Quote:
Originally posted by j8ear
No ones talking about heaven or hell but you. I disagree that personal behaviour shouldn't be regulated. They are, always have been and always will be. There are somethings that shouldn't be, and are, somethings that should, which aren't. Deal with it. You were mistaken in your assesment of the ten commandments applicablity to our legal system. Completed and profoundly mistaken. We've largely moved on.
|
So, your idea wins, the end, huh? And who is this "we" who've moved on? Are you letting Mr. Wiggles in on this conversation?
Quote:
Originally posted by j8ear
Such narrow minded interpretations. It is bigger then god damn or jesus christ. Do you tell them to fuck off or to eat the peanuts out of your shit? Never mind. It doesn't matter. If you want to argue in this fashion: well this one is, but wait not like that, but like this, and that part is stupid, because this says that....you go on having fun with it. I'm not interested.
If you have difficulty seeing how the ten commandments are very applicable to our everyday lives, LEGALLY and Secularly, I'm not sure I can help.
|
See, now you're just being dimissive and rude. Stop it.
Quote:
Originally posted by j8ear
That is not federal law. Sorry. It's interpretation of federal law, and is overturned, re-interpreted, and re-applied routinely. And federal LAW is NOT above state law. Federal Law trumps state law in circumstances ONLY where constitutionally provided OR when state law is deemed in violation of the constitution. That's it.
-bear
|
And you're a constitutional scholar, right?