Quote:
Originally posted by j8ear
This is completely absurd. There is no gaurantee constitutionally on inclusion. NONE WHAT SO EVER.
The people it doesn't represent? Are you so obsessed with diversity and inclusiveness that you discount our own human history on the alter of political correctness? Incorrect, inappropriate, socially detrimental, unconstitutional political correctness?
|
Your argument makes no sense.
The Bill of Rights was formed to protect the minority from the majority. It is, by it's very essence, a document based on diversity and inclusiveness.
"Political correctness" is a buzzword. It's a catch-phrase people use to turn what have always been considered human virtues into something objectionable.
You imply that diversity and inclusiveness are incorrect, inappropriate, socially detrimental and unconstitutional. It seems the alternative would be a society lacking diversity in which chosen segments would be excluded from participation in government by the ruling class.
If nothing else, doesn't our Declaration of Independance and Constitution cry out against that form of government?