View Single Post
Old 08-19-2003, 08:46 AM   #10 (permalink)
FastShark85
Psycho
 
Location: In the garage, under the car.
Atkins allows you to eat as many fiber carbs as you want. The first phase of the diet, called "Induction" requires you to eat less than 20 NET carbs. Net carbs are total carbs minus fiber carbs. So, if an item as 20 carbs and 15 are fiber, it only counts as 5 net carbs.

I've been on the Atkins diet since July 28 and have lost 19 pounds and 2" off my waistline. The first few days are hard since your body is overcoming its addiction to sugar and excessive carbs. Since about day 4 or 5, my energy level has gone way up, my periodic heartburn has completely stopped, I no longer get headaches, my blood pressure has dropped, and I'm sleeping better at night.

Since most beverages contain sugar (and thus many carbs), I've been drinking nothing but water for nearly a month. Doing without caffeine probably causes the better sleeping. I can drink wine if I want to, but I just don't like it with meals.

I'm enjoying the diet now. There are a LOT of people that criticize it, but I believe that much of it stems from the fact that traditional weight loss programs and their proponents view Atkins as an economic challenge to them....it is.

When I started, I asked my brother (who's a board-certified gastroenterologist) whether the diet was OK. He said everything he's heard about it from his colleagues is positive, and he said the lipolysis/ketosis condition brought on by Atkins is NOT harmful in anyway. The diet by default encourages people to increase their intake of protein, which avoids the commonly mistaken condition of ketoacidosis (aka starvation).

I frequent another forum and have a thread that extends 4 pages on the topic. After I took the initial onslaught of ciritcism from people attacking the diet, other people on the Atkins diet jumped in who had only been following the thread before. For those that stayed on the diet past the initial uncomfortable stage, all results were very positive.

Atkins has been around for over 20 years. If it was harmful like the critics say, they would be able to point to specific examples of people who have been harmed by it. I'd like to see such evidence if it exists.
FastShark85 is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360