|
Kak: he doesn't have to have a reason, YOU do, since he does not plan on changing anything, and those who want to legalize gay marriage ARE trying to change something.
that's like saying, "is marriage marriage?" yes, as of now, it is. Now i'm not saying that I don't believe gays have the right to marry (i'll plead the 5th on that one for now) but he doesn't have to have a reason, because as of now, that's what marriage is. the burden of reason is on those who would like to extend marriage rights. Now obviously there are many reasons why it might be prudent to do so, why not outline those instead of attacking jimmy?
|