Quote:
Originally posted by HarmlessRabbit
<b>just something to think about.</b>
I'm curious where you draw the line? I don't mean to be inflammatory, but I'm honestly curious. Are the following things ok?
- Burning the enemy to death using flaming gel to clear a bridge approach
- Using sarin nerve gas to kill the enemy? Using it in a mixed area with civilians in it?
- Using anthrax to eliminate the enemy.
- Assasinating the enemy leaders? The leader's family?
- Feeding enemies through plastic shredders in front of their children?
- Forcing the children of an enemy to shoot their parents?
- Passing prisoners of war off to countries that allow torture in order to get confessions
- Imprisoning citizens for years without access to lawyers or family
Remember, we got into this war because Hussein was a "bad guy".
|
fair question. Here are my answers.
Q - Burning the enemy to death using flaming gel to clear a bridge approach
A - definitely
Q - Using sarin nerve gas to kill the enemy? Using it in a mixed area with civilians in it?
A - no im against both chemical and biological weapons
Q - Using anthrax to eliminate the enemy.
A - again no
Q - Assasinating the enemy leaders? The leader's family?
A - enemy leaders definitely yes. the family depends. I assume you are thinking of sadams sons with this question and since they were part of his command structure then they were legitimate targets. targeting a leaders completely civillian wife and or small children would be a no.
Q - Feeding enemies through plastic shredders in front of their children?
A - no
Q - Forcing the children of an enemy to shoot their parents?
A - no
Q - Passing prisoners of war off to countries that allow torture in order to get confessions
A - sure
Q - Imprisoning citizens for years without access to lawyers or family
A - this one depends. grabbing a citizen off a us street? no capturing a citizen fighting as part of an enemy army engaged in action against us or allied troops? definitely
hope that helps