|
You called me disgusting, and even if you did say I had contempt for nuns in general you would obviously be spinning, and I'd call you on it, but that's beside the point.
They are also not chemical weapons in the sense that the agents petroleum, benzene, and polystyrene (the ingredients for napalm) are largely distilled from natural substances, or are natural substances. According to NATO, they are not chemical weapons. If they are, then so is laundry detergent. I'd be surprised if it mattered to you though, I believe the far left view on the military, and anything a conservative would support is skewed negatively, hence the anti-Bush anti-American sentiment.
As for the article itself, you cannot call them liars, and there were no words to twist, napalm is not what they used. Albeit a technicality, your accusations are fundamentally not true.
Furthermore, the mark 77 firebombs are apparently a very effective means of killing your enemy.
__________________
"I went shopping last night at like 1am. The place was empty and this old woman just making polite conversation said to me, 'where is everyone??' I replied, 'In bed, same place you and I should be!' Took me ten minutes to figure out why she gave me a dirty look." --Some guy
|