You know, I originally posted this in "General Discussion", confidently expecting that if it were to be moved, it'd go into "Humour".... Simply because I think it's funny. I would neverSERIOUSLY compare Dubya with Saddam, but the irony of the US hiding their chemical weapons in a bunker at a city and then citing the very thing they do as a valid reason to invade another country was... well...
Incidentally, Wario,
Saddam was many things, but he certainly wasn't "Friggin Nuts". There was never a time "He kills without reason". The main reason he'd been able to build up the infrastructure to make WMDs was that WE, THE WEST, WILLINGLY SOLD aND EVEN GAVE HIM THE TECHNOLOGY. WE DID THIS DELIBERATELY AND IN THE FULL KNOWLEDGE OF HOW IT'D BE USED!
We know he had WMD capability 'cos we gave him the WMD capability. We did this in the 1980's because Iran was "our" enemy, and Iraq under Saddam was Iran's enemy. Therefore he's our friend, right?
Maybe the US should hire the Iraqi bunker-builders to show the US how to hide chemical weapons properly.
Mike.
|