Actually, if you look at any benchmarks of
equally priced chips, P4 outclasses AMD.
$263 Pentium 4 2.8GHz 800
crushes the equally priced...
$275 - Athlon XP 3000 400
Key Benchmarks from
Tomshardware.com:
Q3 Arena @ 640x480x16: (higher is better)
P4 - 375 fps
AMD - 321.2
Q3 Arena @ 1280x1024x32: (higher is better)
P4 - 292.2 fps
AMD - 274.1
DirectX8 in 3dMark 2001 SE @ 1024x768x32: (higher is better)
P4 - 15942 marks
AMD - 15591
DirectX9 in 3dMark 2003 @ 1024x768x32: (higher is better)
P4 - 4813
AMD - 4745
Mp3 Audio Encoding: Mp3 Maker Platinum 3.04: (faster is better)
P4 - 78 seconds
AMD - 109
Archiving - WinRar 3.11: (faster is better)
P4 - 48 seconds
AMD - 69
Distributed Computing - SETI 3.03: (faster is better)
P4 - 1 minute, 37 seconds
AMD - 2 minutes, 19 seconds
Office Applications - Sysmark2002: (higher is better)
P4 - 383 marks
AMD - 326
Ok, that's enough to clearly crown P4 as the champ. I didn't pick these numbers for the purpose of making P4 look better, all of the benchmarks between these two processors are in P4s favor. And don't give the price argument, because it's also slightly in Intel's favor. Another key thing I left out is AMD still has
heat issues that Pentiums are pretty much free of. My last 3 computers were AMDs, but based on these numbers and some word of mouth, I switched with the new one. Works great. I'll put it to good use when Hl2 comes out (still need to upgrade the video, card though).