Quote:
Originally posted by kalashnikov
Here's my theory: Going back to Darwinian ideas, women with larger breasts would probably produce more milk for the nursing infants. (This is refering to healthy active women, who naturally have a better chance of survival than overweight women; that's why a large pair on fat chicks doesn't arouse a guy the same way). Through natural and sexual selection, men would instinctively prefer larger fuller breasts, and the best way for the men to be aware of their preference is to get a bigger boner (scientific term) when seeing them versus a flatter chest.
I am such a dork.
But god I too am a fan of the boobs.
|
I think along similar lines, except that larger breasts don't produce more milk, all breasts have the same number of milk producing glands. The thing that determines the amount of milk is usually how well fed the mother is. I think the thing is that big breasts are more durable. They can handle more suckling from more children. Then again, maybe the big boobs thing is just media. There are plenty of smaller ones out there, so it can't have been a real disadvantage to have them. Since slimmer girls tend not to have large breasts, they aren't as important as the face, which is the single most important thing on a girl. You have to look at that face every morning for the rest of your life if she is the one, so it better be a pretty damn good looking face.