Quote:
Until it's legalized, you don't know what you are getting when you buy the stuff. Don't be ignorant.
I'll repeat again.. You don't know what you are getting when you buy the stuff.
|
Which is a problem with prohibition, not with meth, and since you have no real data about that, it shouldn't really be used in an argument as a main point. It's a scare tactic. True, you don't know much about what you're getting, but chances are it's not going to kill you instantly (or even eventuallly, unlike cigarettes).
Get over my bias? How about you put up a decent argument, then we'll talk. What methamphetamine is made with is irrelevant to its safety since its unlikely those toxic chemicals are going to be present in the methamphetamine in large enough doses to cause any significant damage. What is relevant is what really is in there, and since neither of us have any actual data about that, maybe we should shut the fuck up about it.
Quote:
|
and how often is meth made properly anyways? I'm sure if you saw who was making your speed and where it was made, you'd think twice before popping it.
|
Right, because "my" meth is made by that skinny as dirty girl down the street with black patches around her eyes. Believing in stereotypes and prejudging is really awesome for lack of a real argument.
Par for the course, from what I see on this entire board when it comes to drug arguments.
So now meth is all dangerous because of possible low doses of chemicals I could most likely find in much larger amount in a pack of cigarettes (oh that's IF dirty girl makes meth, which she doesn't, that's why she's dirty girl). I also don't buy from dirty girl and have no reason to believe any methamphetamine I would or have bought contained any precursor chemicals any deadlier than I would find in a cigarette.
Well gentleman, if that isn't the argument to end all arguments...