I really am amazed at how open-minded people here are. It's refreshing.
Though I'm not sure if this is a little off-topic from Hal's original post, I will ask this: what would Hal's definition label me as?
Physically/Sexually, I have no interest in men. I'm not against the idea, I'm just naturally not enticed by men; I only find women sexually/intimately desirable. However, I will openly acknowledge that a man is handsome, sexy, or attractive, though I am not attracted to him.
Emotionally/Spiritually, I'm open. I've often thought that it's possible I'll never find what I want in a women (I haven't even come close so far), and I'm not opposed to the idea of loving a man; I think I'd be cool with a strong, platonic, lifelong heterosexual thing (a la Jay and Silent Bob). Again, I obviously have the "natural"/social preference towards women, but I wouldn't reject the idea of spending my life with a man.
But here's the monkey wrench: sex means next to nothing to me. I'm not the guy who wants to get laid, I'm not the guy who wants to have sex with his girlfriend; if anything I would "make love" to a life partner. Short of that, actual sexual activity does not fit my personal morals and beliefs. Still, I have found myself only attracted to (and in love with) women.
That being said, what would you make of my "sexual" preference? Just curious-- er--- wondering.
Itchy93
__________________
That's just my opinion; I could be wrong.
Last edited by itchy93; 08-06-2003 at 11:26 AM..
|