|
I agree with asaris, for x to be even considered an action there MUST be a person(s) capable of performing that action.
With this reasoning we can assume that walking down the street is a logical action while walking perpendicular up a wall, without any aid, is not, or at least not until someone is able to accomplish it.
In my opinion, omniscient and omnipotent are completely independent. Say I am omniscient (yay go me) and I know that a country is about to launch a nuclear weaopn at another. This knowledge does not in itself give me the power to stop this attack, unless you want to go into the somewhat gray area that mankind hs not yet unlocked a power in his brain to control objects/people through thought. I don't want to bring the realm of supernatural powers into this philosophical debate.
My point is omniscience does not infer omnipotence.
__________________
Man is condemned to be free
|