|
Cliche, how many times in the history of man have we come up with some axiom based on empirical observation, only to rpove much later that it was a false assumption, and that what was observed was innaccurate? Aristotle'sclassification work was accepted whole cloth for quite some time until some bright boy postulated a better system (I'm no scientist to recall who came with the modern genus/order/species/etc system, and far too lazy to look it up).
Simply because our inherently limited persepective sees something as impossible, why would you assume that an entity whose perspective infinitely exceeds ours would not also see what we think of as impossible is actually simply difficult, or perhaps even easy? Again, I say that when one brings in such absolutes as omniscience, one cannot rationally limit said concept. Knowing everything is fairly unlimited after all.
|