Quote:
|
On a more serious note, what makes this any different than the other civilian casualties (an incredibly now number compared to any other modern war, btw) so far?
|
I think eleven civilian casualties during a raid is an incredibly high number. This was not a wartime raid, these were not incidental deaths as a result of a pitched battle. Eleven people were killed while the US military rushed to a place where Saddam wasn't. Along the way, they opened fire in a crowded city on anyone that approached them, killing women, children, and grandmothers. Would you be outraged if this happened in your hometown during a search for, say, the FBI's #1 most wanted?
This incident is more akin to the outrage following the Ruby Ridge incident with the FBI. While Randy Weaver was a murderer and a known bad guy, the killing of his wife and child in the course of the operation were seen by many as the sign of an FBI that was insensitive.
In the same way, many people see indiscriminate killings like this as a sign that the USA is insensitive to the Iraqi people at a time that we are trying to rebuild the country and rebuild trust with the people.
The cultural insensitivity is, to me, the one thing that there is no excuse for. Islamic law, like Jewish law, demands that bodies be buried quickly using particular procedures. To not return the bodies of innocent victims to their families for proper burial is deeply offensive to the Iraqis involved.