View Single Post
Old 07-31-2003, 02:07 PM   #47 (permalink)
Moonduck
Junkie
 
Location: SE USA
"No problems accepting telekinesis, but you're demanding that omniscience always leads to telekinesis so your BIAV can always assure itself of a beer supply. "

Really? I said that omniscience always leads to telekinesis? I could've sworn that I didn't when I rerad my post a second or two ago. =)

I will reiterate this once more. It is a ludicrous argument. It is ludicrous because it contains such elements as omniscience, omnipotence, and a brain-in-a-vat what desires a brewski. It is, however, wonderful exercise to mentally work on these things, so why not?

Let's say that you are omniscient. You, by definition, know everything. Everything is a lot. A whole lot (Having written that, I feel like Dave Barry). Let's aslo assume, since you dislike the idea, that knowing everything about the human mind doesn't automatically allow you to untap portions of unused potential relating to telekinesis and telepathy. No sweat, right?

Knowing everything presumes that you know things far beyond the ken of mortal, modern man. Now, let's look at the odds. The universe is a damned big place. Really big (there's that Dave Barry feeling again). Mathematically, do you think we're the only planet with advanced life on it? Positing an infinite universe is standard fare these days, and, mathematically, one should find it easy to accept not only other advanced life, but life with culture, science, etc far in advance of ours. Returning to you and your omniscience, you know all about this advanced life and every other advanced lifeform, and everything about its' society and culture. An infinite universe is pretty much guaranteed to have a society what has taught itself the mighty powers of the mind. You now have that knowledge. You teach yourself TK and never have to get up to grab a PBR again.

You are on the right track in saying that omnipotence may lead to omniscience, but I'm not sure how you can accept one without it leading to the other. Omniscience is an absolute, thus it is a pretty big concept. You say that you can know things and not be able to do them. I say that if you know everything, you will know some way to do whatever it is you want to do.

Personally, I find both to be boring. What fun is it to know everything or to be able to do everything? Takes the challenge out of life.

Still, you might want to reread my post. I don't see it as demanding anything. More of having a sort of light bantering tone...
Moonduck is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360