No, I mean John. He's defended his work before. All the data is there, but no one is going to pull it all out into the light of day because it would show he's not lying. This guy is such a thorn in their side that they would have done it a long time ago.
Kind of like that "scholar" who falsified all his data claiming early Americans didn't own guns. In spite of this book having been denounced by other academics, his award revoked, job lost etc. there are still people who want to say it's really the truth. A publisher has already bought the book with the intent to keep it alive. Because that's all the anti-gunners have to work with: spin and lies.
|