Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community - View Single Post

Meridae'n · 07-27-2003, 08:36 PM

The other night, seen “28 days after” with my girlfriend. I’ll spare you guys the movie details, as having spoiler info could make less people give their opinions… but anyway, this ethical question has arisen in our afterwards conversation:

In a situation where there is only, say, 50 fertile women left in the world, would it be within such women’s rights, for whatever reason, to decide not to have children, or would it be their duty to bare as many children as they could manage to during their life, in the interest of preserving the human species?

And then there is the real trick question… if they decide not to have children… would it be acceptable that people forced them to? And when I say force, I mean resorting to every way available, regardless how unethical, including rape?

What is the ethical limit of the rights of the disposition of a person over his/her own body? In what moment, if any, would such terrible violence be acceptable over the legitimate free will, the rightful freedom of a person, in the interest of the human race? And if so would there be limits? And what limits?

07-27-2003, 08:36 PM	#1 (permalink)
Meridae'n Loose Cunt Location: North Bondi RSL	Ethical question about rape... The other night, seen “28 days after” with my girlfriend. I’ll spare you guys the movie details, as having spoiler info could make less people give their opinions… but anyway, this ethical question has arisen in our afterwards conversation: In a situation where there is only, say, 50 fertile women left in the world, would it be within such women’s rights, for whatever reason, to decide not to have children, or would it be their duty to bare as many children as they could manage to during their life, in the interest of preserving the human species? And then there is the real trick question… if they decide not to have children… would it be acceptable that people forced them to? And when I say force, I mean resorting to every way available, regardless how unethical, including rape? What is the ethical limit of the rights of the disposition of a person over his/her own body? In what moment, if any, would such terrible violence be acceptable over the legitimate free will, the rightful freedom of a person, in the interest of the human race? And if so would there be limits? And what limits? __________________ What's easier to believe: that a guy was born without sex in the manner of several Greek demigods and grew up to be able to transmute liquids and alter his body density yet couldn't escape government execution, or that three freemasons in a vehicle made with aluminum foil in an era before digital technology escaped our atmosphere, landing on the moon, broadcasted from there, and then flew back without burning up?