|
1) "Second string" offensive line? C'mon, let's be honest here. The rest of your syllogism falls apart after the first clause. Roaf was a declining player. Turley had his moments, but was not the best team player. Their's is still a team with 4 #1s starting, so stick it.
2) Here's my problem with your reasoning thus far. You state that the Saints suck and won 9 games, but the Panthers are dangerous and won 7 games. Why is it nothing on the one hand to miss the playoffs by 1/2 a game, but an accomplishment to never have been in the running? This only works if each team played in different leagues all together, which isn't the case.
3) Eagles, no arguement.
Giants, hang by the thread that keeps the vodka out of Collins' hands. Three seasons ago? Man, let's stay relevant here.
Redskins, will likely not amount to much as long as Snyder is making personnel decisions, which means never.
Dallas, same thing, but replace Snyder with Jones. You know, for someone who claims to despise the Cowboys, you are certainly conversant with their roster, but that could just be a little web searching, but I still have my doubts. Your listing of the Cowboys sounds like this: No QB of note; a running back that couldn't beat out Emmitt even in his declining years; WR (notice I asked you to list their #1) made up of, in football terms, an old man, a child, and a player referred to by none other than the Tuna himself as "she"; a OG who WAS the man, but definitely seen better days (are you watching too many Classic reruns from the 90s?); Leroi (a name I love, by the way) was cool, but, like Pat Swilling before him, couldn't perform the same minus a strong supporting cast; Dat Nguyen, just a bit undersized to be a LB, don't you think; and one good CB and S. This team is at best two seasons from contending.
The East is a bunch of has-beens, neverwills, and wannabes, with the exception of the Eagles.
5) Huh? First, relevance? Second, who cares? Third, did they make the Super Bowl? Fourth, huh?
|