Quote:
Originally posted by papermachesatan
I'm better cause I'm not some pussy who thinks that playing their own game is mean... boo fucking hoo. These are people that would love to get their hands on you, and kill you for no other reason then you are a (I'm assuming) a white (christian?) westerner. Beat them at their own game, eliminate them.
|
Quote:
I'm sure all those people would like to get their hands on me. Especially the innocent people simply living out their lives, the innocent little boys and girls, etc. Not liking us, protesting agaisnt us, etc. does not make them guilty combatants.
The terrorists target innocent civilians directly, just as you're now suggesting that we do. You hypocrite. You're as much a coward as the guy strapping dynamite to his chest.
|
Why, that's not very nice. Not accurate as it turns out as well:
cow-ard
One who shows ignoble fear in the face of danger or pain.
In this case, I don't think either are cowards. The morality is another question altogether however. Is it worse to kill a soldier or a child? I'd say whatever means takes us to the best possible end works for me, a life is a life, if you have to kill some to preserve many then do it. As for genocide, I think the numbers will show that it's unfeasable and downright evil, even if it would work.