Quote:
This was fun for a while, until it became very obvious that the creator of the system was so completely slanted in his/her political views that they had no idea what civil rights is even about. If the government wasn't involved in solving extremely simplistic issues for the population, then the solution was bad bad bad and drastically effected your liberties rating.
It was fun getting started, but someone needs to put together a version of this which has no hidden agenda so that I can create a separatist libertarian government without being accused of stomping civil rights simply because I don't believe in federally subsidizing every aspect of life.
|
Or perhaps, just perhaps, collections of policies can interact to create situations your politik may not have wished for.
Just a small, tiny, insignificant consideration.
__________________
"I do not agree that the dog in a manger has the final right to the manger even though he may have lain there for a very long time. I do not admit that right. I do not admit for instance, that a great wrong has been done to the Red Indians of America or the black people of Australia. I do not admit that a wrong has been done to these people by the fact that a stronger race, a higher-grade race, a more worldly wise race to put it that way, has come in and taken their place." - Winston Churchill, 1937 --{ORLY?}--
|