Clinton, hands down.
Far as I can remember, he always tried to calm things down before settling a dispute. He was reaching out to other countries, not just telling them what to do.
Bush, after killing support for abortion hospitals, dragged the nation into a war that no body wanted over weapons that were never to be found and is now found trying to shove his shoe into his face because soldiers are dying every day.
I mean, I don't even know what it means when a country just says 'O no, we're not bankrupt at $290 billion, but at $360 billion' (I don't remember the exact figures)
-The government may spend $400 billion more this year than it takes in, dwarfing the previous record, the $290 billion deficit of 1990. To accommodate the imbalances, Bush signed a bill Tuesday adding nearly $1 trillion to the federal borrowing limit -- a record boost exceeding the total debt the government had accumulated in its history through 1980. Yet the resulting $7.38 trillion debt cap will probably suffice only until sometime next year.
Quote:
Do you have any links to back that statement up? Even if it were true, would you prefer an asshole for president, or a slimey crook that lies straight-faced to his wife and the American public?
|
More info can be found at:
http://zzpat.tripod.com/cvb/
I'd still prefer Clinton, he had a personality and was more fun to watch.
p.s.:I had the 'Bush: wanted for terrorism' poster in my window during the war.