|
ok...where to begin. the acc is a good conference. i will have no respect for it when va-tech and miami join it. but up until 2004, i like the acc. as for nc state...probably should have been in my top 25, around...24 or 25. they can win huge games and hang with any team in the nation...but they are grossly inconsistent. maryland? yeah, they beat my vols down in last years bowl game...but even the sun shines on a dog's ass every now and then. without EJ Henderson...they are pretty much washed up on the D side of the ball. and even two years ago when they cracked the top 10, they werent blowing anyone out with thier offense. they are not a top 25 team. if you were to tell me clemson or ga-tech should top 25, i would agree, but not the terps.
as for the big 10. it has already been said. overrated.
to peg the SEC as the most fraudulent conference is horseshit. nobody can make that arguement after all the shit that has gone on in the pac 10 over the past few years. stanford and USC are the only "clean" schools in that entire conference (for football anyway).
anyway...just another little thing to look at when considering the best conference: check out how many NFL starters played for SEC teams. when i counted last year...the SEC had far and away more alums starting in the NFL than any other conference in the NCAA.
and who offerred up k-state as a team that could wax Tenn or Fla? are you kidding? k-state plays the softest teams in college football. i think they may even play some division 2 teams!
i'm out
|